- (2 Pages)
-
- 1
- 2
06 SS Observations
#1
Posted 04 February 2007 - 05:23 PM
Red w/Silver rockers
All options except side air bag & XM radio
#3
Posted 06 February 2007 - 01:56 PM
Red w/Silver rockers
All options except side air bag & XM radio
#4
Posted 06 February 2007 - 07:22 PM
I feel the same way about the rims. I hated them at first, but they are starting to grow on me. I was thinking about ordering some aftermarket rims and have the dealer put them on before I take delivery. But then I started thinking about the tire pressure sensors inside the rims and I don't think I want to mess with those on a brand new car. So now I decided to just order it with the high-polished rims and just live with them.
I can't wait to sell my car so I can place my order. If Chevy comes out with better incentives I may consider just trading it in, but I'd rather not.
#5
Posted 07 February 2007 - 01:49 PM
Red w/Silver rockers
All options except side air bag & XM radio
#6
Posted 08 February 2007 - 07:44 AM
I actually thought I automatically would get the silver painted ground effects since I got the silver rally stripes. Didn't
I can't stand leather seats. They're high maintainence, slippery, crack ( over time), hot as hell in the summer, and cold in the winter. Even with seat heaters, you have to wait for the seats to do their thing before they are comfortable enough so as to not experience some cold when you sit on them. Plus, the seat backs aren't heated. I opted for the leather seat delete option. I ordered my '07 Red SS with the light grey cloth inter., no moon roof, polished wheels, and Chevy's best sound system. This should actually make mine a little bit quicker based on it's less weight ( no moon roof, no seat heaters, cloth weighs less than leather). I am very pleased with the sound system. It's power output is more than enough for me and the quality of the sound is very nice. Best stock system I ever had.
#7
Posted 08 February 2007 - 01:51 PM
I agree with your comments regarding the leather seats and sunroof. I bought my car off the lot with these options, but would ot order them, and would be perfectly happy without them. The sunroof also reduces head room significantly. Some people won't even buy a car without leather seats though, but I don't get the big attraction. As far as the sound system, maybe chevy upgraded it for '07. I'm not complaining about the power, it's the lack of clarity that I don't like. I was riding in a friends 5 year old Saab, and his factory sound system put mine to shame. Anyway, it sounds like you are enjoying your car as much as I am mine. These cars may be the most under rated and least known performance cars on the market today. I get nothing but rave reviews from people who have seen it. Enjoy.
Red w/Silver rockers
All options except side air bag & XM radio
#8
Posted 08 February 2007 - 02:05 PM
Steve Smith said:
you can turn the seats on before you get in the car....
Steve Smith said:
Really?? Mine are... my back actually gets warmer/hotter than the bottom...
#9
Posted 08 February 2007 - 03:02 PM
I'm only 5'9" and my head was very close to touching the head liner because of the less space available with the moon roof. Weren't they called "sun roofs" back in the 70s & 80s?
#10
Posted 08 February 2007 - 03:06 PM
I'm 6', with the sunroof in my SS, and I have an inch or two above my head...
of course, I adjusted the power seat so that it's all the way down, as low as it will go...
#11
Posted 09 February 2007 - 11:49 AM
Steve Smith said:
A sunroof is any opening in the top of a car that lets light/air through. A moonroof specifically is a sunroof in which the glass panel slides in between the headliner and roof of the car. :?
Find me on cardomain. Or, My FQuick, My Motortopia

#12
Posted 09 February 2007 - 12:44 PM
#13
Posted 10 February 2007 - 03:24 AM
#14
Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:03 PM
#15
Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:10 PM
True sunroofs, those made just of metal, appear to have gone the way of 8-tracks in automobiles, and these days, most "sunroofs" are really "moonroofs" -- panels of tempered glass, usually tinted, that tilt up to allow a flow of air, or slide back into the roof entirely, giving the car occupants a brief but tantalizing glimpse of life in a convertible.
#16
Posted 15 February 2007 - 12:10 AM
Find me on cardomain. Or, My FQuick, My Motortopia

#17
Posted 18 February 2007 - 02:45 PM
BTW...the LS4 displacement is listed as 325 cubic inches.
(3.779" bore/2)^2 * pi * 3.622" stroke * 8 cylinders = 3.249 cubic inches.
#20
Posted 12 November 2007 - 02:33 PM
I've been driving a 2000 MC SS and the difference between the two cars is night and day. You press the accelerator and you get pressed back into your seat.
I'm happy and my 17 year old son is happy since he had the 2000 SS passed down to him.
With all of the deals going on now with the 2007 models, do yourself a favor and go buy the SS.
#21
Posted 17 November 2007 - 07:58 PM
Daymack, on Nov 12 2007, 01:33 PM, said:
I've been driving a 2000 MC SS and the difference between the two cars is night and day. You press the accelerator and you get pressed back into your seat.
I'm happy and my 17 year old son is happy since he had the 2000 SS passed down to him.
With all of the deals going on now with the 2007 models, do yourself a favor and go buy the SS.
I second this. My brother traded a 99 Monte LS for one. I was able to drive it and WOW, was immediately hooked. I love my 99, but I would kill for one of these. Just do not understand why these cars did not catch on. If anyone were to drive one I think they would be sold on it right away. Again, WOW!
#24
Posted 07 April 2008 - 08:44 AM
#25
Posted 10 April 2008 - 07:24 AM
327 dave, on Feb 4 2007, 10:23 PM, said:
I am thinking of getting one when I pay off my 03 in 3 more years. I am looking to get the pace car version with the stripes. The only real question I have is how is the interior materials? Are they cheap like the 6th gens? Because seriously, if its the same cheap sh*t I am not getting that car because I am fed up with the interior of my car.
In 3 years my choices will be the G8 GT, Impala SS, Monte SS, or 08 Grand Prix GTP since my GF just bought a 06 GP base model and I love that car.
#26
Posted 10 April 2008 - 02:27 PM
#28
Posted 14 April 2008 - 08:06 PM
CountMonteCarlo, on Apr 13 2008, 09:44 PM, said:
LS4 5.3L 325Cu. Bore x Stroke = 3.78 x 3.622
327 5.4L 327Cu. Bore x Stroke = 4 x 3.25
Two very similar engines but very different as well.
#29
Posted 15 April 2008 - 12:09 AM
All I'm getting at is a pet peeve of mine. I see or hear 327, I think '62-'69 SBC, not an LS4. Granted my little 327 has been rebuilt and was bored 30 over so it's really technically a 331, but yeah whatever it's a 327.
Oh, and of course it counts.
Now then, 526 you say? That sounds b**chin'. NA, Blown, Juiced, come on out with the details of that monster!
#30
Posted 15 April 2008 - 08:58 AM
CountMonteCarlo, on Apr 15 2008, 01:09 AM, said:
All I'm getting at is a pet peeve of mine. I see or hear 327, I think '62-'69 SBC, not an LS4. Granted my little 327 has been rebuilt and was bored 30 over so it's really technically a 331, but yeah whatever it's a 327.
Oh, and of course it counts.
Now then, 526 you say? That sounds b**chin'. NA, Blown, Juiced, come on out with the details of that monster!
Attached File(s)
-
IMGP4604.jpg (41.42K)
Number of downloads: 14 -
DOC3874.jpg (225.61K)
Number of downloads: 17 -
8_4_2007_160.jpg (984.48K)
Number of downloads: 22 -
car_show_003.jpg (127.16K)
Number of downloads: 11
Share this topic:
- (2 Pages)
-
- 1
- 2

Help
















