MyMonte.com - A 1995 to 2007 Chevy Monte Carlo Community: O Ring Seal Replacement - MyMonte.com - A 1995 to 2007 Chevy Monte Carlo Community

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

O Ring Seal Replacement Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Canecutter 

  • Pr0813
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 09-October 09

Posted 09 October 2009 - 08:14 PM

I need some help on replacing the O ring seal.
This is located in the valley of the engine block.
I can see an oil puddle around the seal / clamp bolt.
Do I need to remove the head to fix this? Not too sure if there wil be enough clearance after I remove the intake runners and plenum.
1996 z34 engine.
Thanks.
0

#2 User is offline   Z34_B 

  • I am a meat popsicle
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 143
  • Joined: 28-December 05

Posted 10 October 2009 - 07:30 PM

View PostCanecutter, on Oct 9 2009, 07:14 PM, said:

I need some help on replacing the O ring seal.
This is located in the valley of the engine block.
I can see an oil puddle around the seal / clamp bolt.
Do I need to remove the head to fix this? Not too sure if there wil be enough clearance after I remove the intake runners and plenum.
1996 z34 engine.
Thanks.



Dig around a bit on the site for some help. No you don't need to remove the head, I used a dremel to carve away at the head. You can then take the oring and stretch it over the shaft into the groove, just cut the old one off. Best of luck, -B
'96 Z34 Monte <---!!
0

#3 User is offline   Canecutter 

  • Pr0813
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 09-October 09

Posted 27 October 2009 - 07:55 AM

View PostZ34_B, on Oct 10 2009, 08:30 PM, said:

View PostCanecutter, on Oct 9 2009, 07:14 PM, said:

I need some help on replacing the O ring seal.
This is located in the valley of the engine block.
I can see an oil puddle around the seal / clamp bolt.
Do I need to remove the head to fix this? Not too sure if there wil be enough clearance after I remove the intake runners and plenum.
1996 z34 engine.
Thanks.



Dig around a bit on the site for some help. No you don't need to remove the head, I used a dremel to carve away at the head. You can then take the oring and stretch it over the shaft into the groove, just cut the old one off. Best of luck, -B




Thanks for you help.
I was able to cut a notch on the pump drive seal cap; deep enouh to the top of the freeze plug.
Slipped on a new ring and rtv sealer hopefully this should work.
This is a great site and a lot of useful information here.
Appreciate the help.
0

#4 User is offline   1996A-Z34 

  • Taste's like burning
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: 15-May 09

Posted 07 November 2009 - 11:01 AM

Actually it would be smart to take off the head, rather than dremel it. It will give you a chance while you're down there to replace your head gaskets, and cam carrier gaskets as well. Just preventative maintence
"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all.” -Oscar Wilde
0

#5 User is offline   DigitallyPhoenix 

  • plus 1
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,475
  • Joined: 02-May 02

Posted 07 November 2009 - 02:30 PM

lol so rebuild the top half of this engine because u have a leak that can be fixed without all that work... keep in mind pulling the head involves doing the timing belt which is a few hundred for just parts then throw in the cost of head gaskets and thus is a bit pricy....dont u think?

View Post1996A-Z34, on Nov 7 2009, 11:01 AM, said:

Actually it would be smart to take off the head, rather than dremel it. It will give you a chance while you're down there to replace your head gaskets, and cam carrier gaskets as well. Just preventative maintence

Posted Image
1996 Monte Carlo Z34 (PB-LQ1 14.81@92.2) Mods: P&P Intake/TB,3.73's,L67 injectors, UDP, 2.5" Exhaust - RIP LQ1 10/3/2011
3800 Swap: 3.29 gears, HV3, SD headers, Porting heads/LIM/Blower, HV TB, SLP 1.8RR, 105#, Si Valves, STB, Eibach, GR2's
0

#6 User is offline   1996A-Z34 

  • Taste's like burning
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: 15-May 09

Posted 08 November 2009 - 06:24 PM

View PostDigitallyPhoenix, on Nov 7 2009, 02:30 PM, said:

lol so rebuild the top half of this engine because u have a leak that can be fixed without all that work... keep in mind pulling the head involves doing the timing belt which is a few hundred for just parts then throw in the cost of head gaskets and thus is a bit pricy....dont u think?

View Post1996A-Z34, on Nov 7 2009, 11:01 AM, said:

Actually it would be smart to take off the head, rather than dremel it. It will give you a chance while you're down there to replace your head gaskets, and cam carrier gaskets as well. Just preventative maintence




I did all of it for under $190 so I don't think that is a bad thing to do, you might as well if you're down there. I don't see why everyone puts up the questiion "WHY?" everytime something logical is suggested but when you talk about buying something irrelavant like a spoiler, or set of 22"s everyone just rolls with it, hmmmmm <_<

mine also has 178K mile on her and it is driven hard and was from the autocross track :P Forgot
"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all.” -Oscar Wilde
0

#7 User is offline   mrl390 

  • David Hasselhoff
  • PipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 330
  • Joined: 06-January 08

Posted 08 November 2009 - 07:31 PM

Why spend 200 bucks extra replacing your timing belt prematurely just to fix a leaky oil drive O ring when you can wait and fix the o ring correctly when it actually comes time to replace your timing belt? Thats just how my logic works. Yeah if your T belt or head gaskets could use replacing, then you should just tear into the top end and do it correctly, but if your T belt and gaskets are fine, why waste the effort?
-Matt
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   Canecutter 

  • Pr0813
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 09-October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 10:31 AM

Leak was fixed and car runs good.
Replaced the lower intake gaskets ...those really needed to be changed.
While I had everything out I also took the oportunity to replace the drier, the orifice valve and compressor for the AC as the compressor seal was shot.
I agree with some of the previous posts....if something works well dont mess with it unless you have to.
I did dot dremel off piece of the head I cut a notch into the pump drive seal cover and this gave enough clearance to slip the new seal on.
Will flush the radiator this weekend ......thinking about adding some bars leaks to seal and condition the cooling system.
Anyone ever used this product?
0

#9 User is offline   cak387 

  • Wankerizer 4000
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,260
  • Joined: 16-March 06

Posted 18 November 2009 - 12:01 PM

View PostCanecutter, on Nov 18 2009, 10:31 AM, said:

Leak was fixed and car runs good.
Replaced the lower intake gaskets ...those really needed to be changed.
While I had everything out I also took the oportunity to replace the drier, the orifice valve and compressor for the AC as the compressor seal was shot.
I agree with some of the previous posts....if something works well dont mess with it unless you have to.
I did dot dremel off piece of the head I cut a notch into the pump drive seal cover and this gave enough clearance to slip the new seal on.
Will flush the radiator this weekend ......thinking about adding some bars leaks to seal and condition the cooling system.
Anyone ever used this product?



Do not use bars leak. I think the majority of people on here will agree and say that if it is going to stop the radiator from leaking, it is also going to do the same inside the engine on critical pathways.
Posted Image

Current- 2004 Intimidator SS L67 Sold- 1997 LS-Flowmaster Exhaust, 18" Enkei G Zeros w/ 225-35-ZR18 G-Force Sports
Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
0

#10 User is offline   mitch_09 

  • I am a meat popsicle
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 143
  • Joined: 02-March 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 07:05 PM

View Postcak387, on Nov 18 2009, 12:01 PM, said:

Do not use bars leak. I think the majority of people on here will agree and say that if it is going to stop the radiator from leaking, it is also going to do the same inside the engine on critical pathways.


x2. i was convinced into using this a while ago and...just don't

1995 Z34- cosmetic stuff, sound system, F&R STB's.
0

#11 User is offline   MonteMonster95 

  • Pr0813
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 12-June 06

Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:36 PM

View PostCanecutter, on 18 November 2009 - 10:31 AM, said:

Leak was fixed and car runs good.
Replaced the lower intake gaskets ...those really needed to be changed.
While I had everything out I also took the oportunity to replace the drier, the orifice valve and compressor for the AC as the compressor seal was shot.
I agree with some of the previous posts....if something works well dont mess with it unless you have to.
I did dot dremel off piece of the head I cut a notch into the pump drive seal cover and this gave enough clearance to slip the new seal on.
Will flush the radiator this weekend ......thinking about adding some bars leaks to seal and condition the cooling system.
Anyone ever used this product?


NEVER, EVER, EVER use that crap in your cooling system. You WILL regret it. Gums the whole thing up.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic