Where To Start? 97 Monte Carlo LS red 3.1L MODS???
#1
Posted 26 March 2010 - 08:26 AM
#2
Posted 26 March 2010 - 08:31 AM
Edit: Oh yeah, this is the wrong section to post in but it happens. One of the mods will move it for you though.
This post has been edited by cak387: 26 March 2010 - 08:32 AM

Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
#4
Posted 26 March 2010 - 02:56 PM

'96 Monte L67 - Ported heads | Full 3" Exhaust | Ported TB | 180* T-stat | 104's | HAI | UDAP | SSPlog&Ported Rear | P&P Gen III | Walbro | AFC |
'93 Prelude H22A1 - Header | CAI | 2.5" SS Exhaust |
http://usatyourservice.webs.com | http://www.expertpcnc.com
#5
Posted 29 March 2010 - 08:01 AM
#6
Posted 29 March 2010 - 08:10 AM
#7
Posted 29 March 2010 - 08:33 AM
As far as power goes, you are going to want to look into probably a l26 or l36 for a good compression ratio and then a decent size turbo. You will also want to invest a couple thousand into the tranny to hold up to the power. I don't know how well the 5 speeds hold up to that kind of power.
You are talking about putting a couple thousand dollars into a car that you paid $300 for. These are not the best platforms to make that kind of power. Sure the 3800 is an awesome engine but like 3800monte will tell you, you would benefit a lot more by investing that into a F-body.

Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
#8
Posted 29 March 2010 - 09:07 AM

#9
Posted 29 March 2010 - 09:38 AM

'96 Monte L67 - Ported heads | Full 3" Exhaust | Ported TB | 180* T-stat | 104's | HAI | UDAP | SSPlog&Ported Rear | P&P Gen III | Walbro | AFC |
'93 Prelude H22A1 - Header | CAI | 2.5" SS Exhaust |
http://usatyourservice.webs.com | http://www.expertpcnc.com
#10
Posted 29 March 2010 - 09:46 AM
NiftyMonte, on 29 March 2010 - 10:07 AM, said:
I was biting my tongue by saying what I did but I feel the same. This needs to go with the other ones like the "I have $10,000 to spend on my car."

Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
#11
Posted 29 March 2010 - 08:15 PM
#12
Posted 30 March 2010 - 07:53 AM
#13
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:03 AM
nitehawkjcb, on 29 March 2010 - 10:38 AM, said:
Just a bit of trivia.
The 3x00 pushrods will take at minimum 10psi on a stock engine. The only thing you would really need to do is better fueling and good intake/exhaust.
The engine and components it self are very strong and are known to hold up to quite a lot. It was the gaskets that were our issue, but that has largely been solved at this point. My understanding is the bottom end can take nearly 350-400hp. now can you put that much on a 3.1L displacement engine easily? not really.
Though you are going to need a trans to take the power, this would apply to any major upgrade too.
Though 10-12 still doest no get you 400+ only a little over 1/2 way there (maybe 260-270 on a good clean 3x00), you would need to do MUCH more to hit that goal.
#14
Posted 30 March 2010 - 10:30 AM
Manitcor, on 30 March 2010 - 09:03 AM, said:
nitehawkjcb, on 29 March 2010 - 10:38 AM, said:
Just a bit of trivia.
The 3x00 pushrods will take at minimum 10psi on a stock engine. The only thing you would really need to do is better fueling and good intake/exhaust.
The engine and components it self are very strong and are known to hold up to quite a lot. It was the gaskets that were our issue, but that has largely been solved at this point. My understanding is the bottom end can take nearly 350-400hp. now can you put that much on a 3.1L displacement engine easily? not really.
Though you are going to need a trans to take the power, this would apply to any major upgrade too.
Though 10-12 still doest no get you 400+ only a little over 1/2 way there (maybe 260-270 on a good clean 3x00), you would need to do MUCH more to hit that goal.
Not to mention if you ever do reach that 500whp goal you're not gonna have traction below 80mph
#16
Posted 13 April 2010 - 08:51 AM
Tommy, on 07 April 2010 - 09:43 AM, said:
How mechanically inclined are you? Do you have experience working on cars?
2003 Yamaha R6
1995 Monte Carlo LS
#17
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:22 AM

#18
Posted 13 April 2010 - 12:32 PM
jaybaum96, on 13 April 2010 - 10:22 AM, said:
Why would you swap to an n/a 3800 when you can swap an L67 for the same price and labor time?
#20
Posted 15 April 2010 - 09:53 AM
#21
Posted 15 April 2010 - 10:42 AM
me6894, on 13 April 2010 - 12:32 PM, said:
jaybaum96, on 13 April 2010 - 10:22 AM, said:
Why would you swap to an n/a 3800 when you can swap an L67 for the same price and labor time?
I dont know, just a suggestion.

#22
Posted 15 April 2010 - 10:42 AM
me6894, on 13 April 2010 - 12:32 PM, said:
jaybaum96, on 13 April 2010 - 10:22 AM, said:
Why would you swap to an n/a 3800 when you can swap an L67 for the same price and labor time?
I dont know, just a suggestion.

#23
Posted 15 April 2010 - 08:58 PM
#24
Posted 15 April 2010 - 09:33 PM
ghostriderhd, on 15 April 2010 - 09:58 PM, said:
I don't think so Tim!
http://mymonte.com/d...zy-motorsports/

Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
#25
Posted 15 April 2010 - 10:30 PM

#26
Posted 16 April 2010 - 01:47 AM
Just some food for thought, the top two L67 records with a stock cam and stock heads (both on stock compression too) are about 315-317 whp (which comes out to a hair under 400 crank hp)- obviously that's rockers, a full size IC, etc- but that's not a bad route, and you wouldn't even have to crack the engine open.
#27
Posted 16 April 2010 - 09:00 AM
#28
Posted 16 April 2010 - 01:23 PM
cak387, on 15 April 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
ghostriderhd, on 15 April 2010 - 09:58 PM, said:
I don't think so Tim!
http://mymonte.com/d...zy-motorsports/
gottcha i didnt know that about milzy,but i have bought parts from wot-tech and pcmperf. they were correct and shipped promptly thanks for the info
#29
Posted 16 April 2010 - 02:33 PM
Quote
Sounds cool and all- but a lot of people say they're gonna do that and never follow through; its just an awful lot of work, time, and money.
#30
Posted 16 April 2010 - 04:25 PM
bumpin96monte, on 16 April 2010 - 03:33 PM, said:
Quote
Sounds cool and all- but a lot of people say they're gonna do that and never follow through; its just an awful lot of work, time, and money.
+1 on it never happening

Help






















