MyMonte.com - A 1995 to 2007 Chevy Monte Carlo Community: 3100 Build? - MyMonte.com - A 1995 to 2007 Chevy Monte Carlo Community

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3100 Build? hmmm... Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   jaybaum96 

  • I pity da foo!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,207
  • Joined: 13-June 09

Posted 16 April 2010 - 09:51 AM

Not really thinking about doing it but it may be a possibility. My autos teacher has a 3100 out of a 98 Monte he is willing to give me for free because he's sick of having it sit around. It has 75k on it and it only needs a few sensors (which my 3100 has). Most performance parts for the 3100 are about the same or less in cost than parts for a l67. For example, i can do a tuned pcm, cam, springs, rockers, ported heads and intake manifolds all for the price of a Stock L67 Swap. What is the power potential someone has seen out of a 3100/3400 (without turboing it)? I dont know all that much about these engines so fill me in, as much of my time is spent looking at 3800s Posted Image.

This post has been edited by jaybaum96: 16 April 2010 - 09:52 AM

Posted Image
96 Lumina LTZ Clone - L67/4T65HD SWAP ::SOLD!!!
1995 Nissan S14 240SX ::BROKEN & SOLD!!!
97 Pontiac Grand Prix GT Coupe :)


0

#2 User is offline   mrclean 

  • That'll do pig
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,903
  • Joined: 29-September 07

Posted 16 April 2010 - 11:04 AM

dude dont do it.

3800 or bust
0

#3 User is offline   cak387 

  • Wankerizer 4000
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 16-March 06

Posted 16 April 2010 - 11:09 AM

After that is all said and done, you would be at the equivalent of a stock l67 more than likely. Then when you get upset because you are still at the same power as a l67, you will be SOL because you have done all their is except for boost. Then you would have just been better off with the l67. Honestly, their is no point in modding the 3100 unless you just want a little more performance out of it. If you ever want to do anything else down the line, the l67 is the better platform.
Posted Image

Current- 2004 Intimidator SS L67 Sold- 1997 LS-Flowmaster Exhaust, 18" Enkei G Zeros w/ 225-35-ZR18 G-Force Sports
Performance: Headers, Pulley, Intake, Tune
Suspension: GMPP Full Suspension, Rome Brackets
Appearance: Roof Rails, HID Lows, HID Fogs, 60-60 SMT Switchbacks
0

#4 User is offline   Manitcor 

  • Admin with a Slow Car
  • View gallery
  • Group: Root Admin
  • Posts: 15,727
  • Joined: 31-July 02

Posted 16 April 2010 - 05:05 PM

if your dead set on the 3100 you either go blown or go home, it would take ALOT to make a 3100 a decent NA monster.
1995 LS - 3400, S&S Headers, UD Pulley, ODBII Swap, Modded PCM, other various goodies

#5 User is offline   me6894 

  • I bleed Cheese Wiz
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,528
  • Joined: 16-March 05

Posted 16 April 2010 - 05:12 PM

Quote

For example, i can do a tuned pcm, cam, springs, rockers, ported heads and intake manifolds all for the price of a Stock L67 Swap


But in the end you're still alot slower than a stock L67 and spent way too much money on a motor that's maxed without spending $3k on a turbo.
Posted Image

View Postmstrjon32, on Mar 4 2009, 08:38 AM, said:

L67 swap makes the panties drop.
0

#6 User is offline   zipper778 

  • Wankerizer 4000
  • PipPipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,266
  • Joined: 13-July 07

Posted 16 April 2010 - 10:44 PM

If you do the 3100 build go turbo. Don't waste your time with an NA build. The highest whp I've seen come out of a 3100 was 188whp or something like that. I wanted to do a nice NA 3800 build but look what happened. I was tired of just being a tiny little bit better than a stock L67.

With our v6 engines, go boost.
Posted Image
CSC dyno: 348whp
NA dyno: 222whp
NA PB:
14.4391@95.34mph (at 205whp)
Project Rise Up: 90% done
0

#7 User is offline   jaybaum96 

  • I pity da foo!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,207
  • Joined: 13-June 09

Posted 16 April 2010 - 11:46 PM

haha dumb topic by me. MODS: please delete. I dont know what i was thinking, l67 is what im going with. Posted Image
Posted Image
96 Lumina LTZ Clone - L67/4T65HD SWAP ::SOLD!!!
1995 Nissan S14 240SX ::BROKEN & SOLD!!!
97 Pontiac Grand Prix GT Coupe :)


0

#8 User is offline   BrOnXxBoMbAz213 

  • plus 1
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,442
  • Joined: 30-May 07

Posted 17 April 2010 - 01:34 AM

LOL the most powerful N/A 3100 build was 180whp i think and that was with cam, and ported/polished 3400 intake manifolds.. dont bother... with 75K though maybe swap it in and go turbo, since its much lower mileage it should be more reliable than yours
Posted Image

1999 Chevrolet Lumina "SS"
Infiniti G35 Coupe

View PostNiftyMonte, on Feb 25 2008, 08:32 PM, said:

Well we all have that hole and i'd like to fill mine with somethin. so what have you guys done with yours?? pics would awesome too!!!

View Postme6894, on Oct 13 2009, 12:13 AM, said:

check the nut on the rack and see if it's wet down there. That's where they like to leak.

View PostDevin, on 28 January 2010 - 09:09 AM, said:

does anyone know if this will fit without cutting on my shaft
0

#9 User is offline   me6894 

  • I bleed Cheese Wiz
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,528
  • Joined: 16-March 05

Posted 17 April 2010 - 10:14 AM

View PostBrOnXxBoMbAz213, on 17 April 2010 - 02:34 AM, said:

LOL the most powerful N/A 3100 build was 180whp i think and that was with cam, and ported/polished 3400 intake manifolds.. dont bother... with 75K though maybe swap it in and go turbo, since its much lower mileage it should be more reliable than yours


That was regalblue on here and he also had like stage 3 ported heads (like $1500 there alone), and he still wasn't even close to stock l67 power levels. That's probably why he just disappeared lol.
Posted Image

View Postmstrjon32, on Mar 4 2009, 08:38 AM, said:

L67 swap makes the panties drop.
0

#10 User is offline   MiKe0589 

  • Uncle Ben
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 268
  • Joined: 24-September 07

Posted 17 April 2010 - 11:50 AM

I would have went with a 3500 build, They can make much better power the the 3100.

But then again i am a big fan of 60*'s

Good luck with the swap.
1998 Monte Carlo LS, Dark Carmine Red Metallic.
P&P 3400 UIM, LIM, And TB. Custom FWI. / Descreened MAF.
Polyurethane Dogbone Engine Mounts. Custom Shift Kit. / Dexron VI.
GMPP Front And Rear STB's. SS Rear Brake Lines.
Dyno Tuned. 180*T-Stat. Taylor ThunderVolt 8.2mm Spark Plug Wires.
0

#11 User is offline   Manitcor 

  • Admin with a Slow Car
  • View gallery
  • Group: Root Admin
  • Posts: 15,727
  • Joined: 31-July 02

Posted 17 April 2010 - 02:52 PM

View PostMiKe0589, on 17 April 2010 - 12:50 PM, said:

I would have went with a 3500 build, They can make much better power the the 3100.

But then again i am a big fan of 60*'s

Good luck with the swap.


3400 and 3500 are a completely different scenario esp if you like 660s, these engines actually can get some serious power behind them both NA and boosted. Which I am sure you are well aware.

The biggest reason for this is just build quality IMHO. Tolerances are much tighter on late 3400 and 3500 engines along with some design improvements.
1995 LS - 3400, S&S Headers, UD Pulley, ODBII Swap, Modded PCM, other various goodies

#12 User is offline   MiKe0589 

  • Uncle Ben
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 268
  • Joined: 24-September 07

Posted 17 April 2010 - 03:03 PM

View PostManitcor, on 17 April 2010 - 03:52 PM, said:

View PostMiKe0589, on 17 April 2010 - 12:50 PM, said:

I would have went with a 3500 build, They can make much better power the the 3100.

But then again i am a big fan of 60*'s

Good luck with the swap.


3400 and 3500 are a completely different scenario esp if you like 660s, these engines actually can get some serious power behind them both NA and boosted. Which I am sure you are well aware.

The biggest reason for this is just build quality IMHO. Tolerances are much tighter on late 3400 and 3500 engines along with some design improvements.
Agreed. Posted Image
1998 Monte Carlo LS, Dark Carmine Red Metallic.
P&P 3400 UIM, LIM, And TB. Custom FWI. / Descreened MAF.
Polyurethane Dogbone Engine Mounts. Custom Shift Kit. / Dexron VI.
GMPP Front And Rear STB's. SS Rear Brake Lines.
Dyno Tuned. 180*T-Stat. Taylor ThunderVolt 8.2mm Spark Plug Wires.
0

#13 User is offline   zipper778 

  • Wankerizer 4000
  • PipPipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,266
  • Joined: 13-July 07

Posted 17 April 2010 - 06:20 PM

View Postme6894, on 17 April 2010 - 11:14 AM, said:

View PostBrOnXxBoMbAz213, on 17 April 2010 - 02:34 AM, said:

LOL the most powerful N/A 3100 build was 180whp i think and that was with cam, and ported/polished 3400 intake manifolds.. dont bother... with 75K though maybe swap it in and go turbo, since its much lower mileage it should be more reliable than yours


That was regalblue on here and he also had like stage 3 ported heads (like $1500 there alone), and he still wasn't even close to stock l67 power levels. That's probably why he just disappeared lol.



IIRC he spun a bearing but I never heard what he did with the Lumina after that.
Posted Image
CSC dyno: 348whp
NA dyno: 222whp
NA PB:
14.4391@95.34mph (at 205whp)
Project Rise Up: 90% done
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic